Identity polsjwcc

I support solidarity and liberation which will lead to a classless society without hierarchy

I am against NGO Imperialism

I uphold all identity groups snd their cultures equally who are in danger if being destroyed by globalization, cultural imperialism etc in addition to native religions. I am against this Western imperslism and I support those groups who are struggling against it

I support diversity as I feel our world’s true wealth is the diversity of cultures and peoples. Even if bicultural diversity has negatives, diversity should be welcomed , maintained and cultivated. 

I am against the new class. Western society through globalization promotes a global ruling class through logico symbolic manipulations of the existing systems that are in place. 

They do this via global laissez faire Capitalism, globalism , and institutionalized imperialism. This new class gentrifies the world creating superficial detaches cyborgs so to speak

It is wrong due to being indifferent to history, abstract individualism , lack of culture and detachment from reality and leads to corruption and globalization. They use power to distance themselves from the average citizen so they don’t need to justify their actions. They breed impersonal labor leading to less quality (which is why cars made eons ago were better than modern cars). With less private public meshing, the less individual is rewarded and recognized which forces people to fill a role .New class depersonalizes western leadership and lowers their responsibility.

The New class is ineffective , counter productive and a waste. It closes in on itself causing public hostility at the elite. For major social issues, there is a gap between these rulers and their governed via technocratic means. The media also plays a part in this and deepens it. We see this with the bourgeois and rulers via double talk, virtue signaling, capital indulgence, bottom of the social ladder, struggles of daily life,  nihilism , and the wants for common values.

This leads to anti elitism by the public leading to cynicism. We need more structural autonomy to help the true desires of people on the lower part of that social ladder. This would give them the ability to make or remake specific nomoi. We must create a user friendly society where we avoid anonymity, value commodification and social reification. We would need direct democracy or Democratic Con federalism to do this

1. Against Indifferentiation and Uprooting; For Clear and Strong Identities

I am against indiff..

Homogenization causes the evils of national chauvinism, tribal behavior, irredentism, etc. This is due to globalization, which is responsible for this junk. Western bred self affirming behavior is the result of taking away the rights of individuals to find their identity within a collective and historic framework, uniformity representing people through imposition etc. Now it is sameness that replaces fear of the other.

Modernity has taken away social systems that helped people know their place in society. This leads to people needing their identity affirmed in society and the public square . Modernity has not met these needs identity needs as international tourism don’t fix these problems but instead buries them (see lifestyle blog for more)

I affirm differences which are not transitory that lead to some higher echelon of unity nor are accidental parts of personal lives

These differences are the fabric of the social sphere. It can be political or non political but closer to the individual.

Being a citizen means a sense of belonging and commitment to different levels of public life.

Whether it is at the local level, city level, state level , geographic region level , national level, or more. This is in accordance to devolved power at each of these sovereign levels

We are not global citizens, since that is abstract and abstract is of the bourgeois liberal class

All people should have their causes upheld. This is due to the right of difference and its generalness which emboldens it.  

It is justified only in defending a persons difference from other people if the person is in turn able to defend the difference in others. This means people cannot use the right of difference to exclude people who are different.

Combine this with this “ People have a right to be wrong. That the right to personally discriminate--that is make your own decisions, based upon your own lights--is the very essence of liberty (which retroactively was wrong to allow that 'right'); while Governmental denial of that right, goes to the very essence of tyranny. Individual moral views notwithstanding, freedom to choose ("discrimination") is our right and our privilege no matter how flawed and evil it is.  Humans are biased by nature, people tend to want to be around people who are like them.  I hope humans can evolve one day where this isn't the case, but it is. As long as it is, we can't crucify racists and anti semeties unless they do hate crimes/terrorism or try to get others do hate crimes/terrorism.”

CC

I support Sameera Khan’s right to ‘glorify’ Josef Stalin’s gulags in her tweet years ago because I respect freedom of speech. I believe that in some alternate realities , Stalin’s gulags were fine and humane, but of course not so in our reality (as the Newsweek writers spell my views out on that). I am indifferent to sixth political position on Stalin’s gulags of our reality

She should not have been cancelled because of it because canceling her because of it is almost as bad as the tweet itself

PC

I do not believe Adriana Lima should be an ambassador for Victoria’s Secret. Women like Adriana Lima should be ambassadors for Victoria’s secret